Two of China’s Belt and Road projects reveal a flaw in the G-7′s new global financing plan

Alvin Camba of Fletcher’s Climate Policy Lab discusses his research that sheds light on why countries choose to work with Chinese partners in The Washington Post.
The Washington Post logo

At their summit in Cornwall, England, President Biden urged fellow G-7 leaders to offer billions of dollars in aid to form an alternative to China's Belt and Road Initiative. Since 2013, Beijing's global infrastructure drive has poured Chinese money into energy, mining, port, railroad, telecommunications and other projects across the world.

Biden's team, members of the former Trump administration and senators from both sides of the aisle have expressed concerns that Beijing uses the Belt and Road Initiative to serve China's interests. As a U.S.-led effort, the new Build Back Better World plan announced earlier this month aims to mobilize private capital to address the infrastructure demands of low- and middle-income countries.

But do borrowing countries turn to Chinese financing because they lack global funding options, or because China wields its influence to pressure them? My research in the Philippines illustrates that's not the full story — some leaders choose to work with Beijing because these projects give them greater control over the ventures.

Read More