This policy note discusses the hopes and fears generated by the responsibility to protect' (R2P) agenda, as strongly influenced by the intervention in Libya and lack thereof in Syria. Based on that analysis, it offers a prescription for R2P moving forward, suggesting that it move away from coercive intervention to a strategy of diplomacy and prevention.
Copy CitationBabbitt, E. F. (2017). Responsibility to Protect: Time to Reassess. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 9(3), 431-435. doi:10.1093/jhuman/hux024Copied to clipboard.