Explore Sudan and South Sudan's recent political history and access key documents on our interactive timeline.

Read more

Can we improve civilian protection by studying how mass atrocities have ended in the past? UN Photo/Martine Perret

Read more
Sudan Peace Archive

The WPF's Sudan Peace Archive allows unprecedented access to the process of mediation in the Sudans.

Read more

For over 100 years, the WPF has sought to educate about the waste and destructiveness of war and preparation for war.

Read more

Through graphics and images, Alex de Waal explains Sudan's predicament. Read more.

Read more

New WPF Board Chair

WPF is pleased to announce that its new Chair of the Board is Peter Blum. We thank Philip Khoury, the out-going Chairman whose leadership helped bring the WPF to Tufts University's The Fletcher School, and who will remain a member of the Board.

WPF affiliated research

Claire Smith (York University), a researcher with WPF's How Mass Atrocities End project, published "Illiberal peace-building in hybrid political orders: managing violence during Indonesia's contested political transition," in Third World Quarterly. Read how she employs the concept of 'hybrid political orders' to analyze the logic of illiberal peace-building processes in transitional states.

Ending Mass Atrocities

Learn more about the intellectual work behind WPF's How Mass Atrocities End project in a new essay by Bridget Conley-Zilkic and Alex de Waal, "Setting the Agenda for Evidence-Based Research on Ending Mass Atrocities," published February 2014 in the Journal of Genocide Research.
In the news

De Waal on Sudan and South Sudan

Read Alex de Waal's recent writings on Sudan and South Sudan on our blog: "South Sudan obtained independence in July 2011 as a kleptocracy – a militarized, corrupt neo-patrimonial system of governance."
From the blog

Visualizing South Sudan

Find out why Alex de Waal’s March 13, 2014 essay, "The Culprit: The Army” from his Visualizing South Sudan series is the most popular blog contribution thus far in 2014. One excerpt: “There are 745 generals in the SPLA. That’s 41 more than in the four U.S. services combined, and second only to Russia’s 887 generals and admirals in the world.”
Occasional Paper

Gender, Peace and Conflict

Dyan Mazurana and Keith Proctor draw on interdisciplinary research to provide a summary of the key literature, frameworks and findings in five topic areas related to Gender, Conflict, and Peace, and suggest areas that need further research. Questions addressed include: How does a gender analysis inform our understanding of armed conflict and peace-making? What are the gendered dimensions of war, non-violent resistance, peace processes, and transitional justice?

Nile Deal Signals Regional Reset Among Egypt, Sudan and Ethiopia

  • Ethiopia, Egypt and Sudan have long histories of mutual suspicion to overcome, from tensions over sharing the Nile to being on opposite sides of many of the region’s conflicts. But the turmoil on their borders threatens them all, and the Nile water deal is the first sign that all three recognize the need for cooperation to face those hazards.
  • Nuclear Modernization Spreads…and Spreads to the Headlines

  • Although the US government has been signaling since 2010 that it intends to invest in modernizing its nuclear capabilities (beginning with the April 2010 Nuclear Posture Review Report) and modernization in Russia is well underway, the issue of nuclear modernization has recently captured the attention of major news outlets, with both The Economist [...]

  • A dismal anniversary: four years of violence in Syria

  • Whether one engages with the goal of regime change for reasons of civilian protection or anti-authoritarianism, or a goal of maintaining the state in the name of respect for sovereignty and anti-terrorism, or some other form of rationalization, the effect is the same. The regime in Syria is despicable; ISIS is despicable--but there is a difference between removing the state and conceding ground to nihilist insurgents. The choice is not between friends and enemies, but the choice to de-escalate violence and shift opposition to a political (rather than military) plane, or to increase violence. And whatever the goal, it is important to ask at what point does continuing to feed the dynamic of violence become the worst option?