|
Looking for a previous front page story? |
|
MOUNTING LOSSES:
TERENCE SMITH: Just over a year ago, unemployment
was 3.9 percent, the lowest in
30 years; the November rate
announced today was 5.7
percent, the highest level in six
years. Since March, when the
current recession began, 1.2
million jobs have been lost in the
US economy. Here to walk us through the numbers is Lisa
Lynch, former chief economist with the Labor Department.
She's now at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy
at Tufts University. Welcome. Lisa Lynch, how do you
read these latest unemployment numbers?
Slowdown across all sectors
LISA LYNCH: Well, I think
we've had two months of
back-to-back sobering news on
the employment front between
October and November. The
US economy has lost
approximately 800,000 jobs.
We've seen a sharp increase in the unemployment rate.
And this is now...we're in a recession, it has been officially
designated starting in March of this year, but we're now
seeing the slowdown in the economy permeating across all
sectors within the economy. It's still particularly
concentrated within the manufacturing sector, and yet again
in November manufacturing continued to shed a large
number of jobs. But we're also seeing declines in
employment in other sectors of the economy, across
occupations and across regions of the country.
TERENCE SMITH: And the numbers are higher than you
and others expected?
LISA LYNCH: Yes, the consensus forecast today was
expecting an up tick in the unemployment rate but to 5.6
percent, not to 5.7. And I think probably more importantly
looking at the number of jobs lost, economists were
expecting about 190,000 jobs lost and we had 300,000
plus jobs lost this month, plus a significant downward
revision in employment for last month. So the numbers are
large and staggering and certainly we've not done a
particularly good job forecasting that would happen.
TERENCE SMITH: What
explains them, in your view? Is it
the recession we are seeing
deepening and fulfilling now, or is
it September 11, or some
combination?
LISA LYNCH: I think it's actually a combination of the
two. We saw softening of the economy already starting to
play in on other indicators of economic activity before
September 11. Then we had September 11, and we had a
sharp impact on the employment front. Part of the increase
in the unemployment rate that we're seeing now is
reflecting both September 11 and activities that were
happening slowing down the economy before.
Unemployment is a lagging indicator. We see increases of
the unemployment rate following decreases in economic
activity. So it's not necessarily a surprise that you see the
unemployment rate increasing later on into a recession than
what a group of economists would designate as the start of
the recession, which is March of this year.
TERENCE SMITH: Would it then follow that it's likely to
get worse still before it gets better?
Trends in unemployment
LISA LYNCH: I think
unfortunately that is the situation.
We've not peaked in terms of
the unemployment rate,
unfortunately at 5.7 percent
many economists are forecasting
unemployment rate reaching 6.5
percent by the spring. And we
may very easily reach 6 percent in the unemployment rate
by the beginning of the new year. When we look at the
unemployment numbers, we see that not only are a lot of
people losing jobs, about but people who lost jobs are
staying unemployed for a longer period of time. So people
who have been out of work for six months or more, that
percentage of unemployment has more than doubled since
this summer, so there's a lot of indication that not only are
people losing jobs, but once they lose jobs, it's taking
longer for them to find new employment.
TERENCE SMITH: Can you describe for us, based on
the trends of the last few months, who these people are,
what jobs, which age groups, even what part of the
country?
LISA LYNCH: Well, we're seeing…this is a broad-based
increase in unemployment, across all occupational
categories we're seeing the unemployment rate increasing.
But clearly those with more education have lower
unemployment rates than those with say a high school
diploma or less than a high school degree. But what is
interesting is that you're seeing managerial unemployment
increasing, technician unemployment increasing, skilled
production workers increasing. But the group with the
highest unemployment rate are unskilled production
workers, those with less education. Geographically, we've
seen across most states, about 42 states and the District of
Columbia over the year have seen their unemployment
rates rise, but the areas with the highest unemployment is
concentrated in the West and lower unemployment rates in
the Midwest and the Northeast.
TERENCE SMITH: Any bright spots you can point to?
LISA LYNCH: Well, health
services continues to steadily
add new jobs in health services.
There has been some positive
employment growth in financial
services, and that's very much
concentrated in refinancing,
which many Americans have been taking advantage of the
lower interest rates, consolidating debt in at a lower
interest rate, particularly important now with the slowing of
the economy. So that sector has been growing slightly.
Guard services has been growing as well. But those areas
of growth cannot compensate for the large job losses that
we're seeing elsewhere in the economy.
TERENCE SMITH: And we have the Fed meeting again
next week.
LISA LYNCH: Correct. Next Tuesday they will be
meeting.
TERENCE SMITH: What's your guess?
LISA LYNCH: Well, my guess is that with today's report,
any doubt about whether or not the Fed was going to
actually move next week was taken away. I think the
question now is will, how much will they move in terms of
lowering interest rates? Will they go 25 basis points or 50
basis points? And at the moment, we still do not have an
economic stimulus package coming out of Washington.
And you can be sure the Fed will be looking to see what's
happening on Capitol Hill. But they are the only game in
town at the moment in terms of giving some additional
stimuli into the economy.
TERENCE SMITH: Lisa Lynch, thank you very much.
LISA LYNCH: Thank you, Terry. |